Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Otolaryngol Pol ; 76(2): 34-41, 2021 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20245468

ABSTRACT

<b> Aim:</b> The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related change of the teaching mode from stationary to distance learning on the severity of voice-related ailments among teachers. </br></br> <b> Materials and methods:</b> A questionnaire survey of teachers was conducted to assess voice disorders during stationary and remote work using the Vocal Tract Discomfort (VTDs) scale and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the respondents' subjective feelings were assessed. Demographic and environmental factors associated with voice work were examined. Data on sickness absence, which were obtained from the "Health Needs Maps 2020" Ministry of Health's, were also analyzed. Responses were subjected to statistical analysis. A P-value level below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. </br></br> <b>Results:</b> 128 teachers participated in the survey. The overall assessment of voice disorders using VTDs and NRS scales showed no statistically significant differences for complaints between stationary and remote work. Detailed analysis revealed more se-vere voice disorders in teachers working more than 6 months remotely (P = 0.049) and having more than 20 lessons per week (P = 0.012). Subjective assessment confirmed a significantly lower percentage of teachers reporting voice disorders when wor-king remotely compared to stationary (P = 0.043). This resulted in less sickness absence and a 40% decrease in sick leave related to voice disorders in 2020 compared to 2019. </br></br> <b>Conclusions:</b> During the remote learning period of the COVID-19 pandemic, teachers reported lower severity of voice disor-ders and this influenced the reduction of sickness absences. There were no statistically significant differences in voice complaints as assessed by VTDs and NRS scales for both teaching modes. Several factors affecting the severity of vocal tract disorders were identified - the number of class hours per week (>20) for stationary teaching and a long period of remote teaching (>6 months).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Occupational Diseases , Voice Disorders , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Pandemics , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/epidemiology , Voice Quality
3.
Sensors (Basel) ; 22(17)2022 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2024052

ABSTRACT

Deep learning techniques such as convolutional neural networks (CNN) have been successfully applied to identify pathological voices. However, the major disadvantage of using these advanced models is the lack of interpretability in explaining the predicted outcomes. This drawback further introduces a bottleneck for promoting the classification or detection of voice-disorder systems, especially in this pandemic period. In this paper, we proposed using a series of learnable sinc functions to replace the very first layer of a commonly used CNN to develop an explainable SincNet system for classifying or detecting pathological voices. The applied sinc filters, a front-end signal processor in SincNet, are critical for constructing the meaningful layer and are directly used to extract the acoustic features for following networks to generate high-level voice information. We conducted our tests on three different Far Eastern Memorial Hospital voice datasets. From our evaluations, the proposed approach achieves the highest 7%-accuracy and 9%-sensitivity improvements from conventional methods and thus demonstrates superior performance in predicting input pathological waveforms of the SincNet system. More importantly, we intended to give possible explanations between the system output and the first-layer extracted speech features based on our evaluated results.


Subject(s)
Voice Disorders , Voice , Acoustics , Humans , Neural Networks, Computer , Voice Disorders/diagnosis
4.
Codas ; 34(6): e20210095, 2022.
Article in Portuguese, English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1963166

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To analyze and compare the degree of cervical disability in singers with dysphonia and in singers without self-reported vocal complaints. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational analysis. Sixty-two singers participated in the study: Thirty-two singers without vocal complaints and 30 singers with a speech-language pathology and otorhinolaryngological diagnosis of dysphonia. For singers without vocal complaints, two questionnaires were applied via Google Forms: A three-question questionnaire regarding vocal complaints and how each singer perceived their speaking and singing voice, and the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS). Data on singers with dysphonia were extracted from a database previously collected by a team of researchers at the speech-language pathology department of the Federal University of Minas Gerais. The difference in data collection methodology between the two groups was due to restrictions presented by the coronavirus pandemic. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the two groups, at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the groups (p=0.0001), demonstrating that singers with dysphonia suffered more from cervical pain and discomfort than singers without vocal complaints. CONCLUSION: Singers with dysphonia have more cervical pain and discomfort than singers without vocal complaints, thus presenting with greater cervical disability.


OBJETIVO: analisar e comparar o grau de incapacidade cervical em cantoras disfônicas e em cantoras sem queixas vocais autorreferidas. MÉTODO: estudo observacional analítico transversal. Participaram do estudo 32 cantoras sem queixas vocais e 30 cantoras com diagnóstico fonoaudiológico e otorrinolaringológico de disfonia. Para as cantoras sem queixas vocais foram utilizados dois questionários aplicados virtualmente via GoogleForms, sendo um questionário composto por três perguntas referentes às queixas vocais e como cada cantora percebia sua voz de falada e de forma cantada e a Escala Funcional de Incapacidade do Pescoço de Copenhagen (EFIPC). Os dados referentes às cantoras disfônicas foram extraídos de um banco de dados previamente coletado por uma equipe de pesquisadores no Observatório de Saúde Funcional em Fonoaudiologia da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais e a diferença na metodologia de coleta de dados entre os dois grupos deu-se devido às restrições apresentadas pela pandemia causada pelo coronavírus. Para a comparação entre os dois grupos, foi utilizado o teste Mann-Whitney e foi considerado um nível de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: Houve diferença significativa entre os grupos (p=0,0001), demonstrando que as cantoras disfônicas sofrem mais com dores e desconfortos cervicais do que as cantoras sem queixas vocais. CONCLUSÃO: cantoras disfônicas apresentam mais dor e desconforto cervical do que as cantoras sem queixas vocais, caracterizando uma maior incapacidade cervical.


Subject(s)
Dysphonia , Singing , Voice Disorders , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dysphonia/diagnosis , Hoarseness , Humans , Neck Pain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Quality
5.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 29(3): 179-186, 2021 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1956627

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Spiralling numbers of patients are being referred on the two-week wait (2WW) head and neck cancer referral pathway. Only a small proportion are found to have cancer. There is a call for change in the management of these referrals, particularly following coronavirus. Allied health professionals (AHPs) are being encouraged by the NHS to extend their clinical practice to address increased demand. Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) may offer a solution to some of the 2WW pathway's challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent evidence highlights problems with the pathway and reasons for change. Hoarse voice is consistently found to be the most common presenting symptom. Emerging evidence suggests SLTs can extend their scope of practice to manage new hoarse voice referrals. A pilot project is described. Outcomes from this and other ongoing studies explore efficacy and investment required to make this proposal an achievable prospect for the future. SUMMARY: The management of 2WW referrals on the head and neck cancer pathway needs to change. Preliminary findings suggest SLTs working within the context of the multidisciplinary team can safely extended their role to improve management of these patients. Professional role outline, recognition, guidance, and training framework are needed.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Language Therapy/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Speech Therapy/organization & administration , Voice Disorders/etiology , Adult , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Time-to-Treatment , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/therapy
6.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol ; 30(1): 63-74, 2021 01 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1805676

ABSTRACT

Purpose Evaluation and management of voice and upper airway disorders in adults and children, by speech-language pathologists worldwide, have been significantly altered by the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary to the pathogenic nature of the virus in the respiratory tract and upper airway, it is essential that speech-language pathologists who specialize in these disorders are knowledgeable of current practices to provide evidence-based care while minimizing viral transmission. Understanding how and when SARS-CoV-2 spreads is critical to the development of effective infection prevention within clinical practices. Method We established an evidence-based clinical practice guide for clinicians working with voice and upper airway through a comprehensive evaluation of peer-reviewed journals, non-peer-reviewed manuscripts on preprint servers, national health guidelines, and published and online consensus statements and emerging data. Emphasis was placed on risk mitigation for viral transmission via safe clinical practices, including evaluative procedures, therapy including telehealth, personal protective equipment, room, staffing, and distancing considerations. Results/Conclusions While knowledge relevant to viral transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is rapidly evolving, there is a paucity of literature specific to the evaluation and treatment of voice and upper airway disorders. Within these confines and given the potentially significant high risk of infection secondary to the nature of COVID-19, we summarize current considerations and recommend best practices that maximize risk mitigation whereby ensuring patient and provider safety.


Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/diagnosis , COVID-19/diagnosis , Speech Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Adult , Airway Obstruction/therapy , COVID-19/therapy , Child , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , Speech Disorders/therapy , Voice Disorders/therapy
7.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol ; 31(2): 678-688, 2022 03 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1788331

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this clinical focus article is to provide recommendations for implementation of telepractice services for the evaluation and treatment of voice disorders and to use case examples to highlight the advantages of this modality of service delivery. METHOD: In this clinical focus article, key factors for successful telepractice evaluation and treatment of voice and related disorders are discussed relative to clinical outcome measures. Case examples of telepractice voice therapy are described for a pediatric, transgender, and chronic cough client including associated acoustic, auditory-perceptual, and quality-of-life treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Acoustic, perceptual, and quality-of-life outcome measures demonstrated functional voice improvements after treatment using the telepractice modality. The pediatric client showed decreased perceptual voice strain and increased speech intelligibility. The transgender client showed increased habitual speaking fundamental frequency (pitch) and quality of life. The chronic cough client showed improved vocal hygiene and reduced cough severity. CONCLUSIONS: A review of the literature shows comparable outcomes for in-person and telepractice voice therapy, but special considerations must be made to ensure therapeutic success. We present three representative types of voice cases that illustrate implementation of voice evaluation and treatment using the telepractice modality. In all three cases, the clients' personal therapeutic goals were achieved without needing to travel to the clinic. Furthermore, asynchronous practice opportunities were found to be positive byproducts of using the telepractice modality.


Subject(s)
Voice Disorders , Voice , Child , Humans , Quality of Life , Speech Acoustics , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/therapy , Voice Training
8.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 101(10): 797-804, 2022 10.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1617016

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV2-pandemic, people working in healthcare such as caregives for the elderly face additional burden, e.g. by the use of face masks. METHODS: In a prospective study, the emotional and physical wellbeing as well as the vocal tract discomfort of caregivers of two municipal homes for the elderly were assessed by questionnaires, the Mini-SCL and the Vocal Tract Discomfort Scale (VTDS), and one on personal data (sex, age, lung disease, previous SARS-CoV2-infection) and on voice symptoms. RESULTS: 67% of the questionnaires were answered by 56 women and 11 men aged 45.2 ± 11.5. In the Mini-SCL, increased scores were found in depression in 23.8%, anxiety in 49.3%, somatization in 55.2% and in the global score in 44.7%. 52% showed increased scores in the VTDS. Significant correlations were found in between the subscales of the Mini-SCL and the VTDS as well as to dysphonia symptoms. DISCUSSION: Psychological problems, somatization and vocal tract discomfort is more frequently reported by caregivers for the elderly than in the normal population. The VTDS, voice symptoms and the Mini-SCL scales are significantly related. Training on vocal hygiene should be included in workplace health promotion during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dysphonia , Voice Disorders , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Caregivers , Dysphonia/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/epidemiology , Voice Disorders/etiology , Voice Quality
9.
J Voice ; 35(5): 717-727, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1573967

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since the beginning of the new pandemic, COVID-19 health services have had to face a new scenario. Voice therapy faces a double challenge, interventions using telepractice, and delivering rehabilitation services to a growing population of patients at risk of functional impairment related to the COVID-19 disease. Moreover, as COVID-19 is transmitted through droplets, it is critical to understand how to mitigate these risks during assessment and treatment. OBJECTIVE: To promote safety, and effective clinical practice to voice assessment and rehabilitation in the pandemic COVID-19 context for speech-language pathologists. METHODS: A group of 11 experts in voice and swallowing disorders from five different countries conducted a consensus recommendation following the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery rules building a clinical guide for speech-language pathologists during this pandemic context. RESULTS: The clinical guide provides 65 recommendations for clinicians in the management of voice disorders during the pandemic and includes advice from assessment, direct treatment, telepractice, and teamwork. The consensus was reached 95% for all topics. CONCLUSION: This guideline should be taken only as recommendation; each clinician must attempt to mitigate the risk of infection and achieve the best therapeutic results taking into account the patient's particular reality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Voice Disorders , Voice , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United States , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/epidemiology , Voice Disorders/therapy
10.
J Voice ; 35(5): 808.e13-808.e24, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1573966

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since the beginning of the new pandemic, Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) health services have had to face a new scenario. Voice therapy faces a double challenge, interventions using telepractice, and delivering rehabilitation services to a growing population of patients at risk of functional impairment related to the COVID-19 disease. Moreover, as COVID-19 is transmitted through droplets, it is critical to understand how to mitigate these risks during assessment and treatment. OBJECTIVE: To promote safety, and effective clinical practice to voice assessment and rehabilitation in the pandemic COVID-19 context for speech-language pathologists. METHODS: A group of 11 experts in voice and swallowing disorders from five different countries conducted a consensus recommendation following the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery rules building a clinical guide for speech-language pathologists during this pandemic context. RESULT: The clinical guide provides 79 recommendations for clinicians in the management of voice disorders during the pandemic and includes advice from assessment, direct treatment, telepractice, and teamwork. The consensus was reached 95% for all topics. CONCLUSION: This guideline should be taken only as recommendation; each clinician must attempt to mitigate the risk of infection and achieve the best therapeutic results taking into account the patient's particular reality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Speech-Language Pathology , Voice Disorders , Voice , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United States , Voice Disorders/diagnosis
11.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol ; 30(2): 566-583, 2021 03 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1545663

ABSTRACT

Purpose This study investigated the effects of the in-person and telepractice Global Voice Prevention and Therapy Model (GVPTM) treatment conditions and a control condition with vocally healthy student teachers. Method In this single-blinded, nonrandomized trial, 82 participants completed all aspects of the study. Estill Voice Training was used as the stimulability component of the GVPTM to train multiple new voices meeting all the vocal needs of the student teachers. Outcomes were assessed using acoustic, perceptual, and aerodynamic measures captured by the VoiceEvalU8 app at pre and post in fall and during student teaching in spring. Results Significant improvements were achieved for several acoustic and perceptual measures in the treatment conditions, but not in the control condition. The in-person and telepractice conditions produced similar results. The all-voiced phrase and connected speech were more successful in demonstrating voice change for some of the perturbation measures as compared to sustained /a/. Conclusions The treatment conditions were successful in improving the participants' voices for fundamental frequency and some acoustic perturbation measures while maintaining the improvements during student teaching. In addition, the treatment conditions were successful in decreasing the negative impact of voice-related quality of life and vocal fatigue during student teaching. Future research should address the effectiveness of the various components of the GVPTM, the application of the GVPTM with patients with voice disorders, the relevance of defining auditory-perceptual terms by the anatomy and physiology of the voice production system (i.e., Estill Voice Training), and the continued use of the VoiceEvalU8 app for clinical voice investigations. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13626824.


Subject(s)
Mobile Applications , Voice Disorders , Humans , Quality of Life , Speech Acoustics , Speech Production Measurement , Students , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/prevention & control , Voice Quality , Voice Training
12.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 19149, 2021 09 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1440482

ABSTRACT

Recently deep learning has attained a breakthrough in model accuracy for the classification of images due mainly to convolutional neural networks. In the present study, we attempted to investigate the presence of subclinical voice feature alteration in COVID-19 patients after the recent resolution of disease using deep learning. The study was a prospective study of 76 post COVID-19 patients and 40 healthy individuals. The diagnoses of post COVID-19 patients were based on more than the eighth week after onset of symptoms. Voice samples of an 'ah' sound, coughing sound and a polysyllabic sentence were collected and preprocessed to log-mel spectrogram. Transfer learning using the VGG19 pre-trained convolutional neural network was performed with all voice samples. The performance of the model using the polysyllabic sentence yielded the highest classification performance of all models. The coughing sound produced the lowest classification performance while the ability of the monosyllabic 'ah' sound to predict the recent COVID-19 fell between the other two vocalizations. The model using the polysyllabic sentence achieved 85% accuracy, 89% sensitivity, and 77% specificity. In conclusion, deep learning is able to detect the subtle change in voice features of COVID-19 patients after recent resolution of the disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Cough/diagnosis , Deep Learning , Neural Networks, Computer , Sound , Voice/physiology , Adult , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19/virology , Cough/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/physiopathology
13.
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol ; 47(4): 279-283, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1352047

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To verify the influence of work characteristics and the occupational voice use on the self-perception of vocal fatigue symptoms in individuals working in the home office during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational, and descriptive study. The sample consisted of 206 individuals (123 women and 83 men), with an average age of 34 years, working exclusively in a home office mode due to the pandemic. Through an online form, all participants responded to the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) protocol and the questionnaire on the characterization of work and the occupational voice use during the pandemic, developed by the authors of this study. Multiple linear regression using the backward elimination technique was performed. RESULTS: The variables the interlocutor does "not listen to me in home office work," "noise in the home office work environment," "the daily workload in home office," "vocal quality worsened in home office work," "increased vocal loudness in home office work" and "lack of training about voice use in home office work" are predictors of the dependent variable vocal fatigue symptoms. CONCLUSION: The characteristics of work and occupational voice use influence the self-perception of vocal fatigue symptoms in individuals working in the home office mode during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Health , Voice Disorders , Male , Female , Humans , Adult , Voice Quality , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 278(11): 4383-4390, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1293368

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Due to the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), teachers during the pandemic have had to adapt to online teaching at short notice. This study aims to investigate the voice symptoms and their environmental risk factors as well as the work ability associated with distance teaching and to compare these with symptoms in previous contact teaching. METHODS: We conducted a survey of 121 primary and secondary school teachers across Finland. The survey was advertised online through social media and the replies collected from voluntarily participating teachers. RESULTS: During distance teaching vocal symptoms appeared less often than in school with 71% teachers experiencing them in regular teaching and 44% in distance teaching, VHI result decreased from 7.88 in school teaching to 4.58 in distance teaching. Acoustic conditions were reported to be more suitable in distance teaching with 73% of teachers finding them adequate during distance teaching in comparison to 46% for those in regular teaching. Background noise was the most disturbing factor for a teacher's voice in the classroom and in distance teaching and this was even more conspicuous in the classroom. Also, subjectively experienced poor indoor air quality at school influenced the voice negatively. Further, voice problems were associated with increased subjective stress levels and reduced ability to work. CONCLUSION: Distance teaching has affected teachers' voices in a positive way compared with regular teaching. This difference is likely to be due to better acoustics and indoor air quality in distance teaching conditions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Occupational Diseases , Voice Disorders , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/epidemiology , Voice Disorders/etiology
16.
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol ; 47(3): 194-201, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1228353

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, professional caregivers caring for the elderly may experience more vocal tract problems in addition to regular high vocal demands while wearing face masks/coverings. METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: Vocal tract discomfort (VTD) was assessed in 64 caregivers in one home for the elderly (64% participation rate) in June 2020 using the German version of the VTD scale. RESULTS: More than one-half of the participating caregivers experienced VTD, described mostly as dryness, irritability, and tightness. Approximately, 80% reported that sensations were not perceived before enhanced infection prevention standards were implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Among caregivers caring for the elderly during the COVID-19 pandemic, special care should be focused on the voice and vocal tract well-being.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Voice Disorders , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Caregivers , Humans , Pandemics , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/epidemiology , Voice Disorders/etiology , Voice Quality
17.
J Voice ; 35(2): 169, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1031440
18.
J Voice ; 36(6): 784-792, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-894101

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted via respiratory particles. Respiratory particle emission is impacted by manner of breathing and voicing, as well as intersubject variability. Assessment and treatment of voice disorders may include tasks that increase respiratory particle emission beyond typical breathing and speaking. This could increase the risk of disease transmission via respiratory particles. METHODS: Respiratory particle emission was measured during a single-subject, repeated measures clinical simulation of acoustic and aerodynamic assessment and voice therapy tasks. An optical particle sizer was used to measure particle count (1-10 µm in diameter). Assessment and therapy tasks were completed in three conditions: (1) 15 cm from the device, (2) 1 m from the device, and (3) 1 m from the device with the subject wearing a surgical mask. RESULTS: Condition 1 generated the highest particle count, with a median of 5.1 (13) additional particles above baseline, which was statistically significant (U = 381.5, P= 0.002). In condition 1, therapy and acoustic tasks combined produced more particles compared to the baseline and speech tasks, with a median difference of 6.5 additional particles per time point (U = 309.0, P= 0.002). This difference was not significant for conditions 2 and 3. Peak particle generation occurred in specific phonatory tasks, which was most pronounced in condition 1. Voice therapy tasks during condition 1 generated the highest peaks of normalized total particles with classical singing and expiratory muscle strength training. There was a significant difference in the amount of particle generation between condition 1 and 2, with a median difference of 5.2 particles (U = 461.0, P= 0.002). The particle count difference between conditions 2 and 3 was 2.1 (U = 282.0, P= 0.292), and this difference was not significant. The normalized total particles were assessed over time for each condition. For all conditions, there was no significant accumulation of particles. CONCLUSIONS: For a single subject, production of voice assessment and therapy tasks combined resulted in an increased number of respiratory particles compared to speech and baseline (1-10 µm). EMST and classical singing generated the greatest concentration of particles. Respiratory particle counts were higher at 15 cm from the particle sizer compared to 1 m from the particle sizer, suggesting that physical distancing may reduce immediate clinician exposure to respiratory particles. Particle concentration did not accumulate over time.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Voice Disorders , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/therapy , Phonation , Respiratory System , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/etiology , Voice Disorders/therapy
19.
Laryngoscope ; 131(4): E1227-E1233, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-812670

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the prevalence and associated risk factors of voice disorders in healthcare workers of high-risk hospital care units during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Questionnaire survey to healthcare personnel of COVID-19 high-risk hospital units was conducted, regarding demographic data, clinical activity, the pattern of usage of personal protective equipment, medical and vocal history, vocal symptoms, and Spanish validated Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-10 questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 221 healthcare workers answered the survey. Nearly 33% of them reported having trouble with their voice during the last month, and 26.24% had an abnormal score in the Spanish validated VHI-10 questionnaire. The mean VHI-10 score was 7.92 (95% confidence interval 6.98-8.85). The number of working hours, the number of hours of mask daily use, simultaneous surgical and self-filtering mask use, and working in intermediate or intensive care units were independent variables significantly associated with a higher VHI-10 score. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare workers of high-risk hospital care units during the universal masking COVID-19 pandemic are at risk of voice disorders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E1227-E1233, 2021.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Personal Protective Equipment , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
J Voice ; 36(6): 879.e13-879.e19, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-809297

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: With the COVID-19 outbreak around the globe and its potential effect on infected patients' voice, this study set out to evaluate and compare the acoustic parameters of voice between healthy and infected people in an objective manner. METHODS: Voice samples of 64 COVID-19 patients and 70 healthy Persian speakers who produced a sustained vowel /a/ were evaluated. Between-group comparisons of the data were performed using the two-way ANOVA and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. RESULTS: The results revealed significant differences in CPP, HNR, H1H2, F0SD, jitter, shimmer, and MPT values between COVID-19 patients and the healthy participants. There were also significant differences between the male and female participants in all the acoustic parameters, except jitter, shimmer and MPT. No interaction was observed between gender and health status in any of the acoustic parameters. CONCLUSION: The statistical analysis of the data revealed significant differences between the experimental and control groups in this study. Changes in the acoustic parameters of voice are caused by the insufficient airflow, and increased aperiodicity, irregularity, signal perturbation and level of noise, which are the consequences of pulmonary and laryngological involvements in patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Voice Disorders , Humans , Male , Female , Voice Quality , Speech Acoustics , COVID-19/diagnosis , Acoustics , Voice Disorders/diagnosis , Voice Disorders/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL